The Commercial Real Estate Revolution

I recently facilitated a BIM Webcast for Reed Construction Data. 2500 signed up and 1019 participated, 3x more than anticipated. We also fielded more than 250 questions after the Webcast. That means there is strong interest in the topic.

You can still view and listen to the webcast and review answers to questions by going to WEBCAST. I’m offering a free copy of our the BIM chapter from our book. You can submit your request at the end of this blog.

One of the statistics shared during the Webcast is that BIM use has reached 50%. It is an accurate number if counting the number of architectural firms who have bought BIM software. However, this is where the mirage comes in.

My take is by no means scientific but I have probably visited close to 100 firms in the last two plus years and I always probe how firms are using BIM. Here is what I hear.

Most use BIM for visualization and some for clash detection. The clash detection is again a derivative of the visualization. Both of these applications only require “dumb objects.” A dumb object is a door, a run of ductwork or any part of a building that includes the geometric information but none of the objects properties or rules for how it behaves in relation to other objects. In other words these have the “M” or modeling part of BIM but none of the “I” part that provides analytics.

What are analytics? They can be anything. For example, analytics can contain the data and rules to provide the weight and compression for a section of concrete showing the required tension for reinforcement. One can then model the required balance between rebar and concrete. This not only allows one to make sure there is adequate reinforcement (safety issue) but also not too much (cost issue). A Dallas architect who is the real deal when it comes to BIM use was able to reduce the original concrete spec for a project by $300,000 through BIM modeling and analytics.

The most common use of analytics is clash detection. When objects have data that tell the object where it is in space and what is next to it can tell if someone is trying to design another object that will interfere; like plumbing through ductwork. But I seldom hear that use. Most of the clash detection I hear about from firms is the old fashion visual scan of a plan. I’d rather have the model tell me that I messed up than counting on catching it 100% of the time solely by human review.

There are several deeper levels of BIM use that distinguish the novices and wannabees from what I call the BIM Savants. If you think you are a BIM Savant let me know who you are and why you think you’re the real deal. When I go out to speak I try to recognize those I consider the real deal.

I’m asked less frequently if I think BIM will catch on – its been caught and rapidly growing. However, with the rapid adoption of BIM comes a side effect. Similar to what has been happening to the Green bandwagon. We now have a lot of BIMwashing. Half of the architectural firms are now out telling their clients that they “do BIM” when less than 10% are fully using analytics. Owner’s can’t tell the difference.

So if you are the real deal here is a checklist to see just how proficient you are. If you can check off most of these then pass this list along to your clients so they can test the next firm who promotes their BIM capabilities.

  1. Programming and feasibility – converting programming data into massing models
  2. Visualization of complex shapes – nonlinear fabrication (i.e. Disney’s Opera House in LA)
  3. Visualization of finished products, the reference model – photo-realistic renderings and virtual tours
  4. Design iterations and variations – showing the evolution of the design and different solutions
  5. Construction Documentation and layout
  6. Quantity take offs and cost analysis
  7. Automated integrated specification; material properties and attributes (objects know what they are)
  8. System clash or conflict resolution (objects know where they are)
  9. Construction Administration (scheduling and work optimization)
  10. Communication tool in all phases of a project
  11. CAD CAM manufacturing and offsite fabrication
  12. Shop drawings and installation data
  13. As-built corroboration and systems commissioning
  14. Facilities management interface
  15. Maintenance and operations
  16. Inventory Control
  17. Database for renovations and additions
  18. Equipment performance simulation
  19. Building energy use simulation
  20. Virtual collaboration (i.e. BIMStorm)

I also recommend you look on pages 182-183 in our book to see the evolution path for a firm developing its BIM capabilities.

Here is a short video of Kimon Onuma, a BIM Savant, sharing BIMStorm. Every firm serious about BIM may want to consider playing in a BIMStorm.

For a free copy of the BIM Chapter send me an email at rex@rexmiller.net. Once you read this chapter you’ll probably want to read the rest of the book.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

3 Responses to “The BIM Mirage or BIMwashing”

  1. Rex:

    Interesting and educational. Please send me a copy of the chapter in your book. Also, how would I order the book?

    As I attempt to move forward with the A&E market that services the Federal Government, I need to become generally more knowledgable about these type of tools (BIM), etc.

    I’m aware of the USCG fascination with BIM, as well as the US Army Corps of Enginers.

    I am going to forward this email to of the architectural firms in the NW that has considerable experience with the USCG (AKS, Seattle). One of their principals, Mark Adolphsen, is an ardent Haworth OWS supporter and has used TecCrete over Tate for a number of years, but may not be a BIM convert yet.

    You may want to consider adding Mark to your email list. marka@aksinc.com, Tele 206.623.6832

    I’m sure you’re attending/participating in the Phx USGBC event. I’ll see you there.

    Rea

  2. Rex,

    Great entry … and an excellent point! The latest 2009 McGraw Hill SmartMarket Report – The Business of BIM indicates growth in BIM use from 28% in 2007 to 48% in 2009. Yet today, nearly 50% of the AEC marketplace still sits on the BIM adoption sidelines, observing, as non-participants, in this all-to-important paradigm shift. Why?

    I believe that BIM adoption number maybe much lower.

    I have argued, for sometime now, that the adoption of a true BIM workflow or process (which I define as fully leveraging the “I” directly from the building model: including all programming, design documentation, schedules, analysis, building performance simulation, asset management and facility operations, etc.) to be less than 15% of the entire AECOO marketplace. I specifically include “owners and operators” to be a very, very important component of that real number. Visualization and clash detection, although important aspects, are hardly “BIM.”

    ROI cannot be calculated just through design and construction only.

    Design and construction is but a fraction of the entire cost of a facility over its entire life cycle. Owners and operators are barely reaping the true benefits of BIM adoption. Until, the virtual building or BIM is used as a relational database of information and data over the entire life-cycle of the building, one can hardly call visualization and clash detection “BIM.” Frankly, clash detection and visualization are merely low hanging fruit; it should just be a part of good design.

    And if you want to talk about “sustainability” in our building/development industry in this country (sustainability as environmental, social and economic), why aren’t owners an operators demanding BIM; and not as object, but rather as process?

    Deep, purposeful systems thinking, including: pre-design programming, design and construction analysis and simulating building performance, over time, as well as mining data and information beyond design and construction, through as-built, for facility and asset management during the entire life-cycle is BIM, IMHO. There are many BIM vendors in the marketplace, but the lack of integration and interoperability hinder BIM workflow.

    Thank you Rex, for bringing this important topic to our conversation and dialogue.

    Monte

  3. Hi Rex,
    Please send me the BIM chapter from your book.

Leave a Reply

Latest Blog

Changing the formula for success: lessons from Dominos Pizza

What does selling pizza have to do with revitalizing a struggling AEC industry?
What would it take to walk away from a 50 year old strategy of success?
Patrick Doyle, the new CEO for Dominos, shares how their company confronted the brutal facts about their pizza and began a campaign of change. It is interesting to hear [...]

» read more  |  » view all